All resourcesClaims & carriers

The rush to Symbility is not about better software

USAA, Liberty Mutual, Erie, and Chubb are moving estimates onto a platform the video says writes roughly 30 percent lower than Xactimate. The ownership behind it explains the timing.

A migration nobody asked for

Symbility spent roughly 25 years as the distant second choice behind Xactimate. Almost nobody wrote in it voluntarily. Then, suddenly, carriers like USAA, Liberty Mutual, Erie, and Chubb began mandating it, including inside TPA programs.

Anyone who has written an estimate in the platform knows the punchline. The video's claim is that dollar amounts in Symbility come out roughly 30 percent lower than the same work written in Xactimate. If the software is worse and the numbers are lower, the mandate needs a different explanation than quality.

If the software is worse and the numbers are lower, the mandate needs a different explanation than quality.

Who owns the pricing engine

The video supplies that explanation. In 2021, CoreLogic, Symbility's parent, was acquired by two large investment firms, Insight Partners and Stone Point Capital. Per the video, those firms hold investments in the property and casualty space that touch serious annual claims volume — the same carrier-side money that Florida's buried audit found moving through affiliate companies.

The argument follows directly: if you have money on the carrier side, owning the platform that prices the claims protects the investment. Less paid out in claims means more kept. The video calls this what it is under any other name, price fixing, and points to the RealPage case as the closest recent parallel — the same precedent that hangs over ITEL's ownership chain.

There is also a telling anecdote. When the presenter raised the mandated-use question at an industry conference, the response from a CoreLogic executive was not an answer. It was who are you and where do you work.

Frame from the video examining the investment firms behind Symbility's parent company CoreLogic
From the video: the investors behind the platform carriers now mandate.

The TPA question you eventually have to answer

The video's conclusion is aimed at restorers on TPA programs: get off them. Its prediction is that the TPA model dies within five years, and that mandated platforms are the behavior of a model trying to stay alive, not one winning on merit.

The harder point is the moral one. If the platform you are required to write in systematically underpays the policyholder, handing them that estimate makes you part of the underpayment. Program work keeps crews fed — estimate assists are a real upside — and the video acknowledges that. It still says the trade is not worth it.

Owning your work means owning your estimating capacity. Axiom exists for that side of the trade: it builds a room-organized draft estimate from your field documentation, and your estimator reviews the rooms, codes, and quantities before exporting a native ESX. The judgment stays with your team, not a program requirement.

More resources

View all